Today’s passage tells us what happens when the world identifies us with Jesus.

Luther called some of his enemies pigs[5] and told them to go eat shit. Bonhoeffer said we should derail tyrants and joined a plot to assassinate Hitler.[6] Solzhenitsyn said to always remember that the line between good and evil runs through every human heart.

If all we do are things like housing, feeding, clothing, and educating our neighbours … Why would we need an advocate or comforter?

I worry that what preachers are promising is comfort, heaven, escape. … I rarely hear about decay and decadence, about salt and sacrifice, about bitter toil.

But there’s another usage which we must also consider. The Romans, the colonial oppressors, also referred to themselves as shepherds. In fact, they constantly made false claims that they were good shepherds.

They were very sad. They felt they had invested so much of their lives in Jesus, for the sake of their nation, and got nothing in return.

So, why was Thomas absent that evening, on Resurrection Sunday? I suspect Thomas was absent because

I’m speaking about differences in the accounts, and the reliability of eyewitnesses because of differences in the accounts of Jesus’ resurrection.

After the “priest” consecrated the bread and wine, he issued the usual invitation. Trump stood up to go to the front to receive the body and blood of Jesus, broken for the world.